As the season reaches its climax, one thing is certain - the battle for the La Liga title is far from over, and the final outcome remains uncertain. With just a few points separating the top teams, every match will be a crucial test of character, skill, and determination as the contenders jostle for position in the quest for glory.Hezbollah fires about 250 rockets and other projectiles into Israel in heaviest barrage in weeksfortune gems big win 。

As the community grapples with the aftermath of this tragic incident, it is essential to approach the issue with a nuanced understanding of the factors at play. By addressing the root causes of such violence and promoting mental wellness, we can strive to create a safer and more peaceful society for all.Who owns your face and your voice? Generally, you do. But the question is getting a lot more complicated now that artificial intelligence can capture you from material that’s on the internet and rapidly produce a digital likeness that can do all sorts of things. Many of those things make money. Digital likenesses can appear in movies, TV shows and commercials, as well as monetized snippets on Instagram, Facebook, X, YouTube, Rumble and probably five more platforms that could have a million users by noon tomorrow. So, whose money is that? This is a fascinating question that touches on blood-sucking. That’s not a criticism, it’s a 1979 California Supreme Court decision about Count Dracula merchandise. In 1930, actor Bela Lugosi signed a contract with Universal Pictures to play Dracula. He wasn’t the first or last actor to play the vampire aristocrat, but the performance was so iconic that his voice and likeness became a valuable and marketable commodity. Decades later, when Universal licensed monster movie characters for merchandise, the face of Dracula was Bela Lugosi. Lugosi’s widow and son sued Universal over the unauthorized use of the actor’s image. The state Supreme Court squabbled over whether the right to market Lugosi’s image was included in the original contract, whether the issue was one of property, publicity or privacy rights, and whether the rights had died with Lugosi or transferred to his heirs, undead. A majority of the justices concluded that the right of publicity that belonged to Lugosi when he was alive did not transfer to his heirs. But the California legislature soon stepped in with a new law to establish that the right to profit from the exploitation of an individual’s likeness, with some exceptions, is a right of publicity that survives death. In 1999, after the producers of video dance lessons used movie clips of Fred Astaire without the permission of his widow, Robyn, the legislature passed another law to curtail the exceptions in the earlier law. But at the time, lawmakers did not think to include in the law any limits on using artificial intelligence to generate an entirely new performance by a deceased celebrity and make it available on a YouTube channel. That’s what happened in 2024 to the late George Carlin, when the hosts of the “Dudesy” podcast released a one-hour “comedy” special titled, “George Carlin: I’m Glad I’m Dead.” Carlin’s family was not amused. The Dudesy team claimed that the performance was created with generative artificial intelligence. Carlin’s estate filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court. One of podcast hosts then told the New York Times that the jokes were actually written by the other podcast host, not by an AI-generated Carlin. Did they violate copyright law? Property rights? Publicity rights? Exactly what was created here, who created it, and who has the right to monetize it? The case was settled, so a court didn’t have to decide. But it prompted the union that represents performers, Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, known as SAG-AFTRA, to sponsor legislation in California to broaden the protection the law gives to heirs of people whose valuable performances have suddenly become unlimited AI training material. Related Articles Opinion Columnists | Politicians truly are the worst among us Opinion Columnists | California’s prohibitively expensive recounts are unfair and bad for public trust Opinion Columnists | Democrats really don’t understand democracy, or why they lost the presidential election Opinion Columnists | How Trump handles the U.S.–Mexico relationship is vital, for the U.S. and California Opinion Columnists | Dockworker unions need to be forced to accept reality. Automation is coming and that’s a good thing. Assembly Bill 1836, which takes effect on January 1, 2025, establishes a right to sue over the unauthorized uses of digital replicas in “an expressive audiovisual work or sound recording” without the prior consent of the person who controls the rights to the deceased individual’s likeness. Two more laws taking effect on January 1 extend financial protection to minors whose parents make money by posting videos of their kids on social media. Senate Bill 764 requires parents who “vlog,” defined as posting content for compensation, to put a share of the earnings into a trust account for the child. Assembly Bill 1880 expands the 1938 Coogan Law, later updated into the 1999 Coogan Act, named for child star Jackie Coogan. The law requires that 15% of all gross earnings of a minor under contract for artistic services be set aside in a trust for the minor’s benefit. AB 1880 adds the category of “influencer” to the employment contracts covered by the law. California is battling the future to protect performers. Bravo. Write Susan@SusanShelley.com and follow her on X @Susan_Shelley

By ADRIANA GOMEZ LICON FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — President-elect Donald Trump promised on Tuesday to “vigorously pursue” capital punishment after President Joe Biden commuted the sentences of most people on federal death row partly to stop Trump from pushing forward their executions. Trump criticized Biden’s decision on Monday to change the sentences of 37 of the 40 condemned people to life in prison without parole, arguing that it was senseless and insulted the families of their victims. Biden said converting their punishments to life imprisonment was consistent with the moratorium imposed on federal executions in cases other than terrorism and hate-motivated mass murder. “Joe Biden just commuted the Death Sentence on 37 of the worst killers in our Country,” he wrote on his social media site. “When you hear the acts of each, you won’t believe that he did this. Makes no sense. Relatives and friends are further devastated. They can’t believe this is happening!” Presidents historically have no involvement in dictating or recommending the punishments that federal prosecutors seek for defendants in criminal cases, though Trump has long sought more direct control over the Justice Department’s operations. The president-elect wrote that he would direct the department to pursue the death penalty “as soon as I am inaugurated,” but was vague on what specific actions he may take and said they would be in cases of “violent rapists, murderers, and monsters.” He highlighted the cases of two men who were on federal death row for slaying a woman and a girl, had admitted to killing more and had their sentences commuted by Biden. On the campaign trail, Trump often called for expanding the federal death penalty — including for those who kill police officers, those convicted of drug and human trafficking, and migrants who kill U.S. citizens. “Trump has been fairly consistent in wanting to sort of say that he thinks the death penalty is an important tool and he wants to use it,” said Douglas Berman, an expert on sentencing at Ohio State University’s law school. “But whether practically any of that can happen, either under existing law or other laws, is a heavy lift.” Berman said Trump’s statement at this point seems to be just a response to Biden’s commutation. “I’m inclined to think it’s still in sort of more the rhetoric phase. Just, ‘don’t worry. The new sheriff is coming. I like the death penalty,’” he said. Most Americans have historically supported the death penalty for people convicted of murder, according to decades of annual polling by Gallup, but support has declined over the past few decades. About half of Americans were in favor in an October poll, while roughly 7 in 10 Americans backed capital punishment for murderers in 2007. Before Biden’s commutation, there were 40 federal death row inmates compared with more than 2,000 who have been sentenced to death by states. “The reality is all of these crimes are typically handled by the states,” Berman said. A question is whether the Trump administration would try to take over some state murder cases, such as those related to drug trafficking or smuggling. He could also attempt to take cases from states that have abolished the death penalty. Berman said Trump’s statement, along with some recent actions by states, may present an effort to get the Supreme Court to reconsider a precedent that considers the death penalty disproportionate punishment for rape. “That would literally take decades to unfold. It’s not something that is going to happen overnight,” Berman said. Before one of Trump’s rallies on Aug. 20, his prepared remarks released to the media said he would announce he would ask for the death penalty for child rapists and child traffickers. But Trump never delivered the line. One of the men Trump highlighted on Tuesday was ex-Marine Jorge Avila Torrez, who was sentenced to death for killing a sailor in Virginia and later pleaded guilty to the fatal stabbing of an 8-year-old and a 9-year-old girl in a suburban Chicago park several years before. Related Articles The other man, Thomas Steven Sanders, was sentenced to death for the kidnapping and slaying of a 12-year-old girl in Louisiana, days after shooting the girl’s mother in a wildlife park in Arizona. Court records show he admitted to both killings. Some families of victims expressed anger with Biden’s decision, but the president had faced pressure from advocacy groups urging him to make it more difficult for Trump to increase the use of capital punishment for federal inmates. The ACLU and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops were some of the groups that applauded the decision. Biden left three federal inmates to face execution. They are Dylann Roof, who carried out the 2015 racist slayings of nine Black members of Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina; 2013 Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ; and Robert Bowers, who fatally shot 11 congregants at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life Synagogue in 2018 , the deadliest antisemitic attack in U.S history. Associated Press writers Jill Colvin, Michelle L. Price and Eric Tucker contributed to this report.The launch of the TGA trophy moe emoji pack on Twitch has been met with enthusiastic reception from the community. Fans have been quick to adopt the emojis into their chats, creating a lively and engaging atmosphere that adds to the overall viewing experience. With the ability to use these emojis across different channels and streams, fans can share their love for TGA and their favorite games with a simple click of a button.

Speaking at the conference, the CEO of Cloud Fast Charge expressed enthusiasm for the collaboration opportunities in Anhui, emphasizing the company's long-term vision to contribute to the development of a green and sustainable transportation network. With a focus on user convenience, reliability, and efficiency, Cloud Fast Charge is dedicated to providing seamless charging solutions that empower electric vehicle owners to travel with confidence.Highlights from Trump's interview with Time magazine

Conclusion:Healey admin plan limits family shelter stays to six months, phase out hotels